| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/01/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/01/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.; FURTADO, A. J.; BRUNO, J. F.; PASQUINI NETO, R.; SILVA, G. V. DA; LOBO, A. A.; ABDALLA FILHO, A. L.; PERNA JUNIOR, F.; ALVES, T. C.; MEDEIROS, S. R. de; PEDROSO, A. de F.; RODRIGUES, P. H. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
PATRICIA PERONDI ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, CPPSE; A. J. FURTADO, University of São Paulo; J. F. BRUNO, University of São Paulo; ROLANDO PASQUINI NETO, University of São Paulo; G. V. DA SILVA, University of São Paulo; A. A. LOBO, University of São Paulo; A. L. ABDALLA FILHO, University of São Paulo; F. PERNA JUNIOR, University of São Paulo; TERESA CRISTINA ALVES, CPPSE; SERGIO RAPOSO DE MEDEIROS, CPPSE; ANDRE DE FARIA PEDROSO, CPPSE; P. H. M. RODRIGUES, University of São Paulo. |
|
Título: |
Forage intake of Nellore steers grazing a Cajanus Cajan legume-grass intercropped pasture. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS, 25., 2023, Kentucky. Grassland for Soil, Animal, & Human Health. Proceedings... Kentucky: Curran Associates, 2023. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 1287-1290. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study evaluated forage, supplement, and total (forage + supplement) dry matter intake (DML, expressed as kg/day and as percentage of average live weight, %ALW) of Nellore steers in different production systems, including a Cajanus cajan (Pigeon pea) legume-grass intercropped pasture by using external (titanium dioxide, TiO») and internal (indigestible neutral detergent fiber, INDF) markers. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, SP, Brazil, in the rainy (January) and dry (July) seasons of 2021. Eighteen animals Nellore steers were randomly distributed into three treatments with three replications (1.5 ha paddocks each): 1) degraded pasture of Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk (DEG); 2) Intercropped legume-grass pasture composed by U. decumbens cv. Basilisk, U. brizantha cv. Marandu and Cajanus cajan cv. BRS Mandarin limed and fertilized with P, K, S, micronutrients (INT) and 3) mixture pasture of U. decumbens cv. Basilisk and U. brizantha cv. Marandu limed and fertilized with P, K, S, micronutrients and 200 kg N-urea ha! year (REC). The statistical model considered treatment and season as fixed effects, and the treatmentxseason interaction was tested. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) and means were compared by the Fisher test at 5%. Significant treatmentxseason interaction was found (P < 0.05). During the rainy season lower values of forage and total DMI were found for the INT treatment when compared to REC. However, during the dry season, the treatment with Pigeon pea inclusion (INT) presented higher values of forage and total DMI. The DEG and REC system steers reduced their DMI from the rainy season to the dry season, even receiving a mineral energetic-protein supplement with urea, while the INT steers maintained DMI between seasons without receiving the energetic-protein supplement. These results highlight the potential of including Pigeon pea in pasture-based systems, especially during the dry season when tropical grasses present low nutritional quality and forage availability. MenosThis study evaluated forage, supplement, and total (forage + supplement) dry matter intake (DML, expressed as kg/day and as percentage of average live weight, %ALW) of Nellore steers in different production systems, including a Cajanus cajan (Pigeon pea) legume-grass intercropped pasture by using external (titanium dioxide, TiO») and internal (indigestible neutral detergent fiber, INDF) markers. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, SP, Brazil, in the rainy (January) and dry (July) seasons of 2021. Eighteen animals Nellore steers were randomly distributed into three treatments with three replications (1.5 ha paddocks each): 1) degraded pasture of Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk (DEG); 2) Intercropped legume-grass pasture composed by U. decumbens cv. Basilisk, U. brizantha cv. Marandu and Cajanus cajan cv. BRS Mandarin limed and fertilized with P, K, S, micronutrients (INT) and 3) mixture pasture of U. decumbens cv. Basilisk and U. brizantha cv. Marandu limed and fertilized with P, K, S, micronutrients and 200 kg N-urea ha! year (REC). The statistical model considered treatment and season as fixed effects, and the treatmentxseason interaction was tested. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) and means were compared by the Fisher test at 5%. Significant treatmentxseason interaction was found (P < 0.05). During the rainy season lower values of forage and total DMI were found for the INT treatment when compared to REC. Howe... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
ILPF; INDF; Markers; TiO2; Urochloa spp. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Pigeon peas; Tropical pastures. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03121nam a2200337 a 4500
001 2160514
005 2024-01-08
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, P. P. A.
245 $aForage intake of Nellore steers grazing a Cajanus Cajan legume-grass intercropped pasture.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS, 25., 2023, Kentucky. Grassland for Soil, Animal, & Human Health. Proceedings... Kentucky: Curran Associates$c2023
300 $ap. 1287-1290.
520 $aThis study evaluated forage, supplement, and total (forage + supplement) dry matter intake (DML, expressed as kg/day and as percentage of average live weight, %ALW) of Nellore steers in different production systems, including a Cajanus cajan (Pigeon pea) legume-grass intercropped pasture by using external (titanium dioxide, TiO») and internal (indigestible neutral detergent fiber, INDF) markers. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, SP, Brazil, in the rainy (January) and dry (July) seasons of 2021. Eighteen animals Nellore steers were randomly distributed into three treatments with three replications (1.5 ha paddocks each): 1) degraded pasture of Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk (DEG); 2) Intercropped legume-grass pasture composed by U. decumbens cv. Basilisk, U. brizantha cv. Marandu and Cajanus cajan cv. BRS Mandarin limed and fertilized with P, K, S, micronutrients (INT) and 3) mixture pasture of U. decumbens cv. Basilisk and U. brizantha cv. Marandu limed and fertilized with P, K, S, micronutrients and 200 kg N-urea ha! year (REC). The statistical model considered treatment and season as fixed effects, and the treatmentxseason interaction was tested. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) and means were compared by the Fisher test at 5%. Significant treatmentxseason interaction was found (P < 0.05). During the rainy season lower values of forage and total DMI were found for the INT treatment when compared to REC. However, during the dry season, the treatment with Pigeon pea inclusion (INT) presented higher values of forage and total DMI. The DEG and REC system steers reduced their DMI from the rainy season to the dry season, even receiving a mineral energetic-protein supplement with urea, while the INT steers maintained DMI between seasons without receiving the energetic-protein supplement. These results highlight the potential of including Pigeon pea in pasture-based systems, especially during the dry season when tropical grasses present low nutritional quality and forage availability.
650 $aPigeon peas
650 $aTropical pastures
653 $aILPF
653 $aINDF
653 $aMarkers
653 $aTiO2
653 $aUrochloa spp
700 1 $aFURTADO, A. J.
700 1 $aBRUNO, J. F.
700 1 $aPASQUINI NETO, R.
700 1 $aSILVA, G. V. DA
700 1 $aLOBO, A. A.
700 1 $aABDALLA FILHO, A. L.
700 1 $aPERNA JUNIOR, F.
700 1 $aALVES, T. C.
700 1 $aMEDEIROS, S. R. de
700 1 $aPEDROSO, A. de F.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, P. H. M.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Algodão. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/04/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/04/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MIRANDA, J. E.; SILVA, C. S. B da. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOSÉ EDNILSON MIRANDA, CNPA; CHERRE SADE BEZERRA DA SILVA, CNPA. |
|
Título: |
Bioinsumos no algodão: como o uso do controle biológico tem crescido na cultura do algodoeiro, que fatores limitam sua adoção e como a pesquisa tem trabalhado para aumentar a gama de ferramentas e tecnologias disponíveis ao produtor. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Cultivar, n. , v. 273, p. 11-13, 2022. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O controle biológico é definido como o uso de agentes predadores, parasitoides e/ou entomopatógenos com o objetivo de reduzir as populações de pragas, já se observa uma tendência de aumento do uso de agentes de controle biológico ou bioinsumos no Brasil. O esforço da pesquisa se concentra, assim, em criar novas estratégias biológicas para manejar as pragas agrícolas. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bioinput; Dano econômico. |
|
Thesagro: |
Algodão; Bicudo; Inimigo Natural; Inseto Para Controle Biológico; Nematóide; Percevejo; Pulgão. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biological control; Cotton; Helicoverpa armigera; Nematode control; Plant pests. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1152933/1/BIOINSUMOS-NO-ALGODAO-282.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01339naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2152933
005 2023-04-03
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMIRANDA, J. E.
245 $aBioinsumos no algodão$bcomo o uso do controle biológico tem crescido na cultura do algodoeiro, que fatores limitam sua adoção e como a pesquisa tem trabalhado para aumentar a gama de ferramentas e tecnologias disponíveis ao produtor.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aO controle biológico é definido como o uso de agentes predadores, parasitoides e/ou entomopatógenos com o objetivo de reduzir as populações de pragas, já se observa uma tendência de aumento do uso de agentes de controle biológico ou bioinsumos no Brasil. O esforço da pesquisa se concentra, assim, em criar novas estratégias biológicas para manejar as pragas agrícolas.
650 $aBiological control
650 $aCotton
650 $aHelicoverpa armigera
650 $aNematode control
650 $aPlant pests
650 $aAlgodão
650 $aBicudo
650 $aInimigo Natural
650 $aInseto Para Controle Biológico
650 $aNematóide
650 $aPercevejo
650 $aPulgão
653 $aBioinput
653 $aDano econômico
700 1 $aSILVA, C. S. B da
773 $tRevista Cultivar$gn.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Algodão (CNPA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
